Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

statement

Read a random definition: actuarial equivalent

A quick definition of statement:

A statement is either something someone says or does that they intend to be seen as true, or a formal presentation of facts. In criminal cases, it can also refer to an account of someone's knowledge of a crime given to the police during an investigation. There are different types of statements, such as false statements which are knowingly untrue and incriminating statements which suggest someone's guilt. A prior consistent statement is a witness's earlier statement that conflicts with their testimony at trial, and a sworn statement is one given under oath. A voluntary statement is one made without any pressure or influence.

A more thorough explanation:

A statement is a verbal or nonverbal assertion intended as evidence or a formal presentation of facts. It can also refer to an account of a person's knowledge of a crime taken by the police during their investigation.

  • Consonant statement: A prior declaration of a witness, testified to by a person to whom the declaration was made and allowed into evidence only after the witness's testimony has been impeached. For example, if a witness changes their testimony during a trial, a consonant statement made earlier can be used to show that their original testimony was truthful.
  • False statement: An untrue statement knowingly made with the intent to mislead. For example, if someone lies under oath during a trial, they are making a false statement and can be charged with perjury.
  • Prior consistent statement: A witness's earlier statement that conflicts with the witness's testimony at trial. This type of statement can be used to rebut a charge that the testimony was improperly influenced or fabricated.
  • Sworn statement: A statement given under oath, such as an affidavit.
  • Voluntary statement: A statement made without the influence of duress, coercion, or inducement. For example, if a suspect voluntarily confesses to a crime without being pressured by the police, their statement can be used as evidence.

These examples illustrate the different types of statements that can be used as evidence in legal proceedings. They show how statements can be used to establish the truth or falsehood of a claim, and how they can be used to impeach a witness's testimony.

stateless person | Statement and Account Clause

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 12 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
jackfrost11770
16:48
how many ppls usually show up to those things
<3 much love to yall. i gtg back to work now but thanks for celebrating w me
jackfrost11770
16:49
They have one every month don't they
i cant imagine cornell keeping track of who goes to the lets talk
i mean maybe?
jackfrost11770
16:50
I mean they asked for lsac number but yeah I don't imagine they specifically keep track? Gtown does tho ....
jackfrost11770
16:50
But gtown is special lmfao
jackfrost11770
16:50
In a bad way
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
nope cornell can be 2.
cornell is incredibly based
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.