Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statute of Allegiance de Facto

Read a random definition: private contract

A quick definition of Statute of Allegiance de Facto:

Statute of Allegiance de Facto: A law that required people to pledge loyalty to the current king or queen, even if they were not the rightful ruler. This law protected people who followed the de facto monarch and punished those who supported the de jure monarch. It was passed during the reign of King Henry VII in England.

A more thorough explanation:

The Statute of Allegiance de Facto was a law that required subjects to pledge their loyalty to the current (de facto) king or ruler, and protected them from any consequences for doing so. This law was enacted during the reign of King Henry VII in England, in the year 1495.

For example, if a new king had taken the throne by force or through other means that were not entirely legitimate, the Statute of Allegiance de Facto would require all subjects to swear allegiance to that king, even if they did not necessarily agree with his claim to the throne. By doing so, they would be protected from any punishment or retribution for their loyalty.

This law was important in maintaining stability and order during times of political upheaval or uncertainty, as it ensured that the people would remain loyal to the current ruler, regardless of how they came to power. It also helped to prevent civil unrest or rebellion, as those who swore allegiance to the de facto king were legally protected from any consequences for doing so.

Statute of Accumulations | Statute of Amendments and Jeofails

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.