Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statute of repose

Read a random definition: locative calls

A quick definition of Statute of repose:

A statute of repose is a law that prevents someone from making a claim against another person or entity after a certain amount of time has passed, even if the person has not yet been harmed. This time period starts from the date of the action taken by the defendant, and is usually more favorable to the defendant than a statute of limitations.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A law that prevents claims from being made against a defendant after a certain period of time has passed, even if the plaintiff has not yet been injured. This time period starts from the date of the defendant's action, and is generally more favorable to defendants than a statute of limitations.

One example of a statute of repose is in the construction industry. In some states, there is a statute of repose that prevents claims from being made against a contractor or architect after a certain number of years have passed since the construction was completed, regardless of whether or not any injuries or damages have occurred.

Another example is in product liability cases. Some states have a statute of repose that prevents claims from being made against a manufacturer after a certain number of years have passed since the product was sold, even if the product has not yet caused any harm.

These examples illustrate how a statute of repose can limit a plaintiff's ability to bring a claim against a defendant, even if the defendant's actions may have caused harm in the future. This can be beneficial for defendants, as it provides them with a certain level of protection from potential lawsuits that may arise years after their actions have taken place.

Statute of limitations | statutory construction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.