Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statute of Westminster the First

Read a random definition: indigenous

A quick definition of Statute of Westminster the First:

The Statute of Westminster the First was a law made in England a long time ago. It had 51 parts that talked about different things. Some parts were about protecting the church's things from the king and rich people. Other parts were about making sure people could vote freely. It also made some changes to the rules about how people could be punished for breaking the law. The law was made in the year 1275.

A more thorough explanation:

The Statute of Westminster the First was an English law that was divided into 51 chapters, which later became separate acts of Parliament. It was created to protect the property of the church from the violence and spoliation of the Crown and nobles, provide for the freedom of popular elections, enforce the rules contained in Magna Carta against excessive fines, and correct various abuses of power.

Some examples of the provisions included in the Statute of Westminster the First are:

  • Protecting the property of the church from the Crown and nobles
  • Providing for the freedom of popular elections
  • Enforcing the rules contained in Magna Carta against excessive fines
  • Regulating the levying of tolls
  • Correcting and restraining the powers of the royal escheator and other officers
  • Amending the criminal law, such as classifying rape as a most grievous offense
  • Making criminal and civil procedures more expeditious and less costly

These examples illustrate how the Statute of Westminster the First aimed to protect the rights of individuals and limit the power of the Crown and other officials. It also aimed to improve the legal system and make it more fair and efficient.

Statute of Uses | statute of wills

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.