Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

statutory rape

Read a random definition: canonical disability

A quick definition of statutory rape:

Statutory rape is when an adult has sex with someone who is not old enough to say yes. Even if the younger person agrees to have sex, it is still against the law because they are not old enough to make that decision. This is because the law says that people under a certain age cannot make decisions about sex. It is a serious crime and different places call it different things, but it is always against the law.

A more thorough explanation:

Statutory rape is a type of sexual assault that occurs when a person engages in sexual activity with someone who is below the age of consent. Even if the minor consents to the sexual activity, it is still considered rape because the law assumes that minors are not capable of giving informed consent.

For example, if a 25-year-old has sex with a 16-year-old, it is considered statutory rape because the 16-year-old is below the age of consent. Similarly, if a 19-year-old has sex with a 15-year-old, it is also considered statutory rape.

Statutory rape is a serious crime, and the laws surrounding it vary from state to state. Some states use different terms for the crime, such as rape of a child, sexual assault, or unlawful sex with a minor.

It is important to understand that statutory rape is not the same as forcible rape, which involves the use of physical force or threats to coerce someone into sexual activity. In statutory rape cases, there may not be any overt force or threat involved.

statutory offer of settlement | statutory share

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.