Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Statutum de Nova Custuma

Read a random definition: lex privata

A quick definition of Statutum de Nova Custuma:

Statutum de Nova Custuma: A law made in England in 1303 that gave special privileges to certain foreign merchants. These merchants had to pay taxes, but in return, they were allowed to trade freely throughout England, export their goods, live wherever they wanted, and had certain legal rights. This law is also known as Carta Mercatoria.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Statutum de Nova Custuma was an English statute enacted in 1303 that established rules favoring certain foreign merchants. In exchange for paying customs duties, these merchants received extensive trading rights throughout England, the power to export their merchandise, the liberty to dwell where they pleased, and certain legal rights. It is also known as Carta Mercatoria.

Example: A merchant from France who paid customs duties could sell their goods in London and other English cities without any restrictions. They could also live wherever they wanted and had legal rights to protect their business interests.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the Statutum de Nova Custuma allowed foreign merchants to conduct business in England with greater freedom and protection. By paying customs duties, they gained access to extensive trading rights and legal protections that helped them succeed in the English market.

statutum | stay of mandate

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 10 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Law-Guy
16:51
Do you need camera on/mic on for those Lets Talk Cornell things? I kinda want to attend but I'm at work
jackfrost11770
16:51
I have no idea I've never been to one
jackfrost11770
16:51
Hence Idk what to expect even capacity wise
jackfrost11770
16:51
But I'm literally still 30 minutes from home and it's in 10 min so unless I join on my phone with no camera or mic then I cannot lmao
jackfrost11770
16:55
You know what if Cornell don't want me they don't me I'm not worrying myself over this
Law-Guy
16:57
There was a Vandy wave today?
GodsPlanUltimately
16:57
@jackfrost11770: What a excellent mindset. Cornell must have poor taste
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:58
1. Kansas 196. Cornell
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
nope cornell can be 2.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
cornell is incredibly based
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
16:58
our professors are sigmapilled goonmaxxers
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:59
i see, a quality education
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
https://case.edu/law/our-school/news/case-western-reserve-school-law-becomes-first-law-school-us-require-legal-ai-education-certification-all-first-year-law-students
GodsPlanUltimately
16:59
Interesting folks.
jackfrost11770
17:00
Cornell put me on reserve after interview they are at least slightly unbased
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:01
@jackfrost11770: thats why they sit at 2
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
17:01
cornell is based but universal rule is adcoms are ghouls
texaslawhopefully
17:01
this is depressing lol: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/boilingfrogs/shock-and-awe/
Dkk
17:01
@GodsPlanUltimately smart of them
Dkk
17:02
How is it unpopular when he got the pop vote and the electoral college. Unreadable after the title.
SplitterusClitterus
17:02
Who’s hearing from uclaaa rnnnn
texaslawhopefully
17:03
Glad you're back dk lmao. If you read the actual article, it's that his day one EO's are wildly unpopular (for instance the majority of americans support birthright citizenship). He can have won the popular vote and still do unpopular stuff
texaslawhopefully
17:03
"Two recent polls found opposition to pardoning the J6ers at 57 and 59 percent, respectively, and that was before Americans understood that even the cop-beaters in the crowd that day would be let off scot-free."
NuttyTalentedEmu
17:04
I wonder if this chat has mods
llama
17:04
as most dictators who have come into power do, he appealed to the masses just to turn face once in power
SplitterusClitterus
17:04
Barely nutty
Dkk
17:04
@texas maybe so. Maybe so.
llama
17:04
we have been duped.
llama
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.