Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

substantial-factor test

Read a random definition: actuarius

A quick definition of substantial-factor test:

The substantial-factor test is a way to determine if someone's actions caused harm to another person. It means that if someone's behavior was a big part of why someone else got hurt, then they are responsible for the harm. This is different from the but-for test, which only looks at whether the harm would have happened without the person's actions.

A more thorough explanation:

The substantial-factor test is a principle used in tort law to determine causation. It states that the defendant's conduct is considered a significant contributor to the plaintiff's injuries. This means that if the defendant's actions played a substantial role in causing harm to the plaintiff, then they can be held liable for the damages.

For example, if a driver is texting while driving and hits a pedestrian, causing them to suffer serious injuries, the driver's conduct would be considered a substantial factor in causing the harm. Even if there were other factors that contributed to the accident, such as poor lighting or the pedestrian not paying attention, the driver's actions would still be considered a significant cause of the injuries.

Another example could be a case where a company releases a defective product that causes harm to a consumer. If it can be shown that the defect was a substantial factor in causing the harm, then the company can be held liable for the damages.

The substantial-factor test is used to determine causation in many different types of tort cases, including personal injury, product liability, and medical malpractice. It helps to ensure that those who are responsible for causing harm are held accountable for their actions.

substantial equivalent | substantial justice

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
Just found out LSAC gpa is different from offical from undergrad, went from 3.0 on 4.0 scale to 2.67... Guess I'm a super splitter rather than a splitter
just submitted my first ever app! and now I am consumed by The Dread
23:55
@SassyLearnedSquid: congrats
23:56
@OppositeEarlyCorgi: yep, fuckin sucks. My community college is scalled down by LSAC so I go from a 3.77 to a 3.44 or some shit like that.
23:58
My community college didn't have the A+ grade and only A's at 4.0 so there are classes I know I got an A+ in and should have a 4.0 but LSAC sees it as a 3.7 or whatever.
23:58
Idk, hard to describe.
23:59
My bad, should have had 4.33 but LSAC sees it as 4.0
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.