Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

substantial similarity

Read a random definition: act of God

A quick definition of substantial similarity:

Substantial similarity refers to how much one thing looks or sounds like another thing that is protected by a trademark or copyright. If something is too similar to a protected work, it may be considered infringement. The level of similarity needed to be considered infringement depends on the product and how careful the typical buyer would be in choosing it. For example, someone buying a watch would be expected to be more careful than someone buying candy. There are different types of similarity, such as comprehensive nonliteral similarity, which means copying the general ideas or structure of a work, and fragmented literal similarity, which means copying exact words or phrases. Substantial similarity is a strong resemblance between a protected work and an alleged infringement, which creates an inference of unauthorized copying.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Substantial similarity refers to the resemblance of one trademark or copyrighted work to another. It is a question of overall impression rather than an element-by-element comparison of the two marks.

For example, if a company creates a logo that is very similar to another company's logo, it may be considered substantial similarity. The standard for substantial similarity depends on the nature of the product and how much care the typical buyer would be expected to take in making the selection in that particular market.

In copyright law, substantial similarity can refer to both comprehensive nonliteral similarity and fragmented literal similarity. Comprehensive nonliteral similarity is when there is similarity in the general ideas or structure of a work, such as a movie's plot, without using the precise words or phrases of the work. Fragmented literal similarity is when there is similarity in verbatim portions of the protected work.

The standard for substantial similarity in copyright law is whether an ordinary person would conclude that the alleged infringement has appropriated nontrivial amounts of the copyrighted work's expressions. For example, if a book is copied almost word-for-word by another author, it may be considered substantial similarity.

substantial right | substantial-step test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MrThickRopes
16:33
they splurgin out dem rs nd wls at smu but i din get none
16:38
@Law-Shark: they didn't say we had to go? and if they are willing to buy rooms for a bunch of people. they sent me a res because I was over 50 miles away but I didn't even ask for one
16:42
@Law-Shark: also kind of rude for you to be speaking to me like that, the event started at 9am and I had to wakeup at 4 to drive in. i was tired and couldn't even check in until 4pm if I wanted to so I just drove back. it's unprofessional to offer it the night before and not the day after. they also didn't feed us actual food and we were there until 2pm.
Law-Shark
16:43
The fact you didn't think a reservation in your name is something you need to be responsible for and cancel if you weren't going to show up to by sending a simple email is absolutely iresponsible.
16:43
I didn't make a reservation tho?
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.