Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

summary of the argument

Read a random definition: specific legacy

A quick definition of summary of the argument:

A summary of the argument is a brief section in a legal document, usually an appellate brief, where the lawyer summarizes the main points of their argument. It is usually one to four pages long and directs the court to the heart of the argument on each point. The summary should be clear and concise, condensing the argument made in the body of the brief. It is important to note that mere repetition of the headings under which the argument is arranged is not sufficient.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A summary of the argument is a part of a brief, usually an appellate brief, where the advocate summarizes the argument to a précis or synopsis, directing the court to the heart of the argument on each point. It is typically one to four pages long.

For example, if a lawyer is presenting a case to an appellate court, they will provide a summary of the argument in their brief. This summary will condense the argument to a few pages, highlighting the key points and directing the court to the most important parts of the argument.

The purpose of the summary of the argument is to make it easier for the court to understand the argument being presented. It allows the court to quickly grasp the main points of the argument without having to read through the entire brief.

summary offense | summary of the invention

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.