Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

supermajority

Read a random definition: vassallo faciendo superiori quod de jure facere oportet

A quick definition of supermajority:

A supermajority is a specific number or percentage of votes that is greater than half. It is often required for important decisions, such as changing a constitution or making major changes to a company. For example, a two-thirds supermajority may be needed to pass a certain measure. This is different from a simple majority, which is just over half of the votes. A supermajority is a way to ensure that decisions are made with a strong consensus and not just a slim majority.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A supermajority is a fixed proportion greater than half, such as two-thirds, especially a percentage required for a measure to pass. It is needed for certain extraordinary actions, such as ratifying a constitutional amendment or approving a fundamental corporate change.

Example: In the United States, a two-thirds supermajority vote is required in both the House of Representatives and the Senate to override a presidential veto. This means that at least two-thirds of the members of each chamber must vote in favor of the bill in order to make it a law, even if the president has vetoed it.

Explanation: This example illustrates how a supermajority is used in the legislative process to ensure that important decisions are made with a high level of agreement among lawmakers. By requiring a two-thirds majority to override a presidential veto, the U.S. Constitution ensures that the president's veto power is not easily overridden and that any laws passed by Congress have broad support.

super jure naturae alendi liberos | supernumerarii

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.