Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

surcharge

Read a random definition: entire blood

A quick definition of surcharge:

Surcharge: An extra amount of money that is added to a bill or payment because it was not paid on time or because something was left out. For example, if you don't pay your bill on time, you might have to pay a surcharge. In some cases, a court might order someone to pay a surcharge if they didn't do their job properly and caused harm to someone else.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A surcharge is an additional amount of money charged on top of a tax, fee, or cost. It may be added because the original amount was not paid on time or as a penalty for a mistake or violation.

For example, if you don't pay your credit card bill on time, you may be charged a surcharge on top of the amount you owe. This is a penalty for not paying on time. Another example is when you buy a plane ticket and there is a fuel surcharge added to the cost. This is an additional fee to cover the cost of fuel.

In legal terms, a surcharge can also refer to a court order for a fiduciary (someone who manages money for someone else) to pay extra money to repair damages caused by a breach of their duties. For instance, if a trustee mismanages a trust and causes financial harm to the beneficiaries, the court may order them to pay a surcharge to make up for the losses.

These examples illustrate how a surcharge is an extra charge added to an existing cost or fee. It can be a penalty for not paying on time or a way to cover additional expenses. In legal terms, it can also be a way to hold someone accountable for their actions and make things right for those who were harmed.

Supreme Court | Surety

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.