Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

surrejoinder

Read a random definition: deposit of title deeds

A quick definition of surrejoinder:

Term: Surrejoinder

Definition: In the legal system, when someone sues another person, they have to file a document called a "pleading" that explains their case. If the person being sued responds with a document called a "rejoinder," the person who filed the original pleading can respond with a document called a "surrejoinder." This goes back and forth until both sides have said everything they want to say.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Surrejoinder is a term used in common-law pleading. It refers to the plaintiff's response to the defendant's rejoinder. In other words, it is the plaintiff's answer to the defendant's reply to the plaintiff's original claim.

For example, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for breach of contract, the defendant may file a response called a "rejoinder" that disputes the plaintiff's claims. The plaintiff can then file a "surrejoinder" to respond to the defendant's rejoinder.

The common-law system of pleading allows for a series of back-and-forth responses between the parties involved in a lawsuit. After the plaintiff files a complaint, the defendant can file an answer. The plaintiff can then file a reply to the defendant's answer, and the defendant can file a rejoinder to the plaintiff's reply. Finally, the plaintiff can file a surrejoinder to the defendant's rejoinder.

Example: In a lawsuit over a car accident, the plaintiff claims that the defendant was at fault for the accident and seeks damages for their injuries. The defendant files an answer denying fault and arguing that the plaintiff was actually responsible for the accident. The plaintiff files a reply to the defendant's answer, providing evidence to support their original claim. The defendant then files a rejoinder, arguing that the evidence provided by the plaintiff is insufficient. Finally, the plaintiff files a surrejoinder, responding to the defendant's arguments and providing additional evidence to support their claim.

This example illustrates how the surrejoinder is a part of the common-law system of pleading, which allows for a structured process of back-and-forth responses between the parties involved in a lawsuit.

surrebutter | surrender by bail

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 8 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
gov hiring freeze is insane
Remember when Elon musk literally did the nazi salute twice , yeah
Insane
his goal is to crush public opinion of the government by intentionally making ineffective and then pointing to how ineffective it is
Dkk
17:05
I personally think most people are one issue voters and rhey disagree on principle but things have to be done this say now or else they never will.
17:05
oh well should be a good little 'societal experiment' if u will
@SplitterusClitterus: he clearly just meant his heart goes out to him, just ignore his support for the literal fascist party in germany
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.