Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

surveillance

Read a random definition: malware

A quick definition of surveillance:

Surveillance means watching someone to collect information. Police often use surveillance to investigate people they think might have done something wrong. There are two types of surveillance: when the person being watched knows about it (overt) and when they don't (covert). Surveillance can be done using electronic devices like cameras, phones, and computers, or by watching someone in person. But, there are rules about how surveillance can be done. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures, which means that the police can't just watch anyone they want without a good reason. Sometimes they need a special permission called a warrant to do it. If someone is watched without a good reason, they can take legal action against the person who did it.

A more thorough explanation:

Surveillance is when someone watches another person to gather information. Police often use surveillance to investigate suspects and collect evidence. There are two types of surveillance: overt and covert. Overt surveillance is when the person being watched knows they are being watched. Covert surveillance is when the person being watched does not know they are being watched.

Surveillance can be done in different ways. Electronic surveillance is when technology is used to watch someone. Examples of electronic surveillance include wiretapping, bugging, and tracking someone's location using their phone. Fixed surveillance is when someone is watched in person. This is also called a "stake-out."

However, there are limits to surveillance. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that surveillance cannot be done without a good reason. For example, in the case of Kyllo v. U.S., the Supreme Court said that using technology to look inside someone's home without a warrant is not allowed. Electronic surveillance also requires a warrant, which is a legal document that allows the police to do the surveillance. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) is a law that regulates electronic surveillance and gives people the right to sue if they are illegally watched.

For example, if the police want to listen to someone's phone calls, they need a warrant. They have to show that they have a good reason to listen to the calls, and they have to describe exactly what they will be listening to. This is to make sure that the police do not listen to calls that are not related to their investigation.

surrogate court | surviving spouse

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.