Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

sweat-of-the-brow doctrine

Read a random definition: hilo settlement

A quick definition of sweat-of-the-brow doctrine:

The sweat-of-the-brow doctrine used to be a rule that said copyrights could protect the hard work and money put into creating something, even if it wasn't very original. However, this rule was thrown out by the Supreme Court in 1991 in a case called Feist Pubs., Inc. v. Rural Tel. Servs. Co. Now, copyrights only protect things that are truly original and creative.

A more thorough explanation:

The sweat-of-the-brow doctrine used to be a principle that said copyrights could protect the hard work and money that went into creating a work, rather than just the originality of the work itself. For example, if someone spent a lot of time and effort compiling a phone book, they could claim copyright protection for it, even though the information in the phone book was not original.

However, in 1991, the Supreme Court rejected this doctrine in a case called Feist Pubs., Inc. v. Rural Tel. Servs. Co. The court said that copyright protection should only be given to works that are original and creative, not just those that required a lot of effort to create.

For example, if someone takes a photograph of a famous landmark, they cannot claim copyright protection just because they spent a lot of time and money traveling to the location and setting up the shot. The photograph must be original and creative in order to be protected by copyright law.

sweating | sweatshop

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.