Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

swindle

Read a random definition: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

A quick definition of swindle:

Term: Swindle

Definition: Swindle means tricking someone into giving away their money or things they own by lying or cheating.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: To swindle means to take someone's money or property by tricking or deceiving them.

Example 1: A man calls you and says he's from the IRS and you owe back taxes. He threatens to have you arrested if you don't pay immediately. You give him your credit card information, but later find out it was a scam. The man swindled you out of your money.

Example 2: A woman sells you a car and tells you it's in great condition. You pay her the full amount, but when you try to drive it home, the engine breaks down. You realize she swindled you by lying about the car's condition.

These examples illustrate how someone can use deceit or fraud to take advantage of another person and take their money or property. It's important to be cautious and do research before making any financial transactions to avoid being swindled.

swift witness | syndicate

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
no i think there should be a Law School combine with all new drills except there is still the 40 yard dash
and a sub 4.5 gets you into any t14
LSAT can be one of the drills
letsseehowitgoesnow
11:17
so washu only called one person
So all the D1 athletes will get into a T-14. What else is new?
@TheAdoptedOne: that is called "Dean Poker Night" lol
@ClockworkBlue: I feel like most people could train for the 40 for the same amount of time as they do the LSAT and get close to sub 5 which would be equivalent to a 167+
this is like the schizophrenic posts JJK tik tok be putting out
powerscaling Law School deans up next
11:19
Election Day election day
Write in Dean Z vote
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.