Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Table 2: U.S. State Legal Frameworks

Read a random definition: burden of persuasion

A quick definition of Table 2: U.S. State Legal Frameworks:

Table 2: U.S. State Legal Frameworks

The purpose of this table is to provide a quick way to compare the different laws that each state in the United States has against spam. The table has an "x" for each type of law that a state has. You can click on the links to learn more about each state's specific laws. The table includes laws about spam emails, telemarketing, faxes, texts, and other media. It also includes laws about email pornography and computer-related crimes. The table covers all 50 states, as well as Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

A more thorough explanation:

The purpose of this table is to provide a quick comparison of the legal frameworks of U.S. states regarding anti-spam laws. The table uses an "x" to indicate if a state has a law of a particular type. The reader can click on the state-specific page for more detailed information, including statutory citations.

For example, if you look at the table, you can see that California has laws against spam, commercial email, and email pornography. However, they do not have specific laws against telemarketing or anti-solicitation for faxes, texts, or other media.

This table is useful for people who want to understand the different legal frameworks in each state and how they compare to each other.

Table 1: Overarching Anti-Spam Frameworks in the United States, Canada, and the European Union | Table 3: U.S. States with Laws Specific to Commercial Email and Spam

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.