Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

tainted stock

Read a random definition: plead (one's) belly

A quick definition of tainted stock:

Tainted stock is a type of stock that is owned or transferred by someone who is not allowed to file a lawsuit on behalf of the company. This person is usually disqualified because they have a conflict of interest or have done something wrong. If someone buys tainted stock in good faith, they are also not allowed to file a lawsuit. It's like having a toy that you're not allowed to play with because it's broken or someone else's.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Tainted stock refers to stock owned or transferred by a person who is disqualified from serving as a plaintiff in a derivative action. This means that the person cannot sue on behalf of the company because of a conflict of interest or other disqualifying factor.

Example: If a company executive is accused of wrongdoing and owns stock in the company, they may be disqualified from bringing a lawsuit on behalf of the company. Additionally, if someone buys tainted stock from the executive, they too may be disqualified from bringing a lawsuit.

Explanation: Tainted stock can create conflicts of interest and undermine the ability of shareholders to hold the company accountable for wrongdoing. By disqualifying certain individuals from bringing lawsuits, the legal system aims to prevent these conflicts and ensure that lawsuits are brought in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

taint | take a default judgment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.