Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Takers in Default

Read a random definition: Pregnancy Discrimination Act

A quick definition of Takers in Default:

Term: Takers in Default

Definition: Takers in default are the people who get something if someone doesn't use their special power to give it to someone else. For example, if someone has the power to give a house to their friend, but they don't do it, the takers in default would be the people who would get the house instead. The takers in default are usually named in a special part of the document that talks about the power.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Takers in default refer to the individuals or class of individuals who will receive the property or assets if the power of appointment is not properly exercised. This clause is usually included in the power of appointment document.

For example, if a person has a power of appointment over a trust, they may have the ability to appoint the trust assets to their children or grandchildren. However, if they fail to properly exercise this power, the takers in default clause will determine who receives the assets. This clause may state that the assets will go to the person's siblings or nieces and nephews.

Another example is if a person has a power of appointment over a piece of real estate. If they do not properly exercise this power, the takers in default clause may state that the property will go to the person's surviving spouse or children.

These examples illustrate how takers in default are the individuals or class of individuals who will receive the property or assets if the power of appointment is not properly exercised. It is important to include a takers in default clause in a power of appointment document to ensure that the property or assets are distributed according to the person's wishes.

Takeover | taking

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
23:12
Windy wya
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.