Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Takers in Default

Read a random definition: offer of settlement

A quick definition of Takers in Default:

Term: Takers in Default

Definition: Takers in default are the people who get something if someone doesn't use their special power to give it to someone else. For example, if someone has the power to give a house to their friend, but they don't do it, the takers in default would be the people who would get the house instead. The takers in default are usually named in a special part of the document that talks about the power.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Takers in default refer to the individuals or class of individuals who will receive the property or assets if the power of appointment is not properly exercised. This clause is usually included in the power of appointment document.

For example, if a person has a power of appointment over a trust, they may have the ability to appoint the trust assets to their children or grandchildren. However, if they fail to properly exercise this power, the takers in default clause will determine who receives the assets. This clause may state that the assets will go to the person's siblings or nieces and nephews.

Another example is if a person has a power of appointment over a piece of real estate. If they do not properly exercise this power, the takers in default clause may state that the property will go to the person's surviving spouse or children.

These examples illustrate how takers in default are the individuals or class of individuals who will receive the property or assets if the power of appointment is not properly exercised. It is important to include a takers in default clause in a power of appointment document to ensure that the property or assets are distributed according to the person's wishes.

Takeover | taking

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:25
twitter is making me so mad i may have to get rid of it
texaslawhopefully
14:25
I’m going to get dogged on for saying this, but LSAT Demon has fairly good explanations
14:25
i had demon for a month and they have flushed out written explanations that helpo
14:26
7sage explanations are so sucky i gotta watch a vid of a dude eliminiating an answer choice with 2 seconds of explainaing why
dude, i feel like 7sage guy speedruns thru the whole test.
14:30
the vids are 80% him reading the stimulus out loud then he devotes 4 seconds to each answer choice i swear
14:31
i shake my fist to the sky]
LOL thats so true...they were good for LG but now i dont see the point... applied to GULC mid oct, havent received II or anything, so i HAVE to be cooked, right?
windyMagician
14:35
my parents didn’t know i was applying to law school until i got in. it’s great being old
windyMagician
14:35
my dad barely knows the difference between mich and umn
yeah, my parent thinks cardozo is better than fordham because someone she knows got in fordham LLM and that person is plain stupid so fordham HAS to be bad
lmao fordham is a great school she’s a silly billy, if you wrote your ps about your veteran mom adcoms would throw it out lol. our parents try their best :)
yeah, she's an immigrant from post soviet country, born and raised there - i understand where she is coming from, american culture is way different.
yeah yeah exactly. +1 for lsat demon a lot of people who don’t like 7sage end up liking demon
does lsat demon accept lsac fee waiver
14:46
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: yes very easy
14:47
to apply it. I love it- looking like a 155-170+ in a few months for me
oh i just checked, i still have to pay even if i have a fee waiver, damn
14:48
imo go basic with FW, then when (if) you run out of questions/tests, upgrade OR just take tests /drill on lawhib
14:48
the long sleep
ill give a free edition a try first, if i like then i will purchase. they have 3 free tests, right?
14:50
oh yea obi go free- yes 3 free tests. yes they can be crude/'mean' but they explain all 5 answers and when u upgrade they have good write ups on ea question
ill start prepping in january and aim for august lsat or september even. would it look bad if i have 3-4 attempts on my record? I already took it twice and cancelled my first score so im bit worried about that lol
nope lots of people take the lsat 3-4 times
14:59
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: is it bad: some schools seem to prefer 1 and done vs 2+ takes. Is it better for you? If score much higher- yes. Overall, if it makes sense for u go for it
you might have to write an addendum though, but schools really want higher medians so if they see a big number that's all they honestly care about
14:59
^^^
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.