Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

tender back rule

Read a random definition: ASCAP

A quick definition of tender back rule:

The tender-back rule is a legal rule that applies to agreements between employers and employees. If an employee accepts a severance package or other benefits from their employer in exchange for waiving their right to sue the employer, the employee must return those benefits if they decide to sue. This rule is meant to prevent employees from taking the benefits and then trying to get more money through a lawsuit. However, there are some types of claims, like those related to discrimination, where the rule does not apply.

A more thorough explanation:

The tender-back rule is a legal principle that applies to waiver or release agreements in an employment context. It requires an employee to return any consideration received from an employer if they wish to litigate any issue that was supposedly waived.

An employer offers a severance package to an employee with an agreement stating that acceptance of the package waives all of the employee's rights to future claims against the employer. If the employee decides to sue the employer for a claim that was supposedly waived, they must return the severance amount received before commencing the lawsuit.

The tender-back rule is commonly used as a defense by employers to prevent employees from taking the benefit of the agreement and then pursuing additional compensation through litigation. The rule imposes an obligation on potential plaintiffs to return any consideration received before commencing any claim or counterclaim.

However, the tender-back rule does not apply to all claims. For example, claims brought under the Equal Pay Act (EPA), Title VII, and Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) do not trigger the tender-back rule, and plaintiffs asserting violations of these acts do not have to return any consideration to commence litigation.

In summary, the tender-back rule requires an employee to return any consideration received from an employer if they wish to litigate any issue that was supposedly waived.

tender | tender offer

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.