Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

testifying expert

Read a random definition: marital misconduct

A quick definition of testifying expert:

A testifying expert is someone who knows a lot about a certain topic and can help a judge or jury understand it better. They are usually hired by one side in a court case to give their opinion. They have to tell everyone what they know and how they came to their opinion. This is different from a consulting expert, who is hired to help but doesn't have to testify in court. There are also impartial experts who are chosen by the court to give an unbiased opinion.

A more thorough explanation:

A testifying expert is a person who has special knowledge or skills in a particular subject and is called to give their opinion in court to help the judge or jury make a decision. They are identified by one of the parties as a potential witness at trial.

For example, in a medical malpractice case, a doctor who specializes in the same field as the defendant doctor may be called as a testifying expert to give their opinion on whether the defendant doctor acted negligently.

As part of the legal process, a party must provide information about the testifying expert's qualifications and opinion to all other parties. This is to ensure that everyone has access to the same information and can prepare their case accordingly.

testifier | testimonial evidence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Is barkelay sending out WL?
12:39
I don't have a great explanation for my GPA. I was lazy and unmotivated. Now I'm not. Just believe me please. That's about it
babycat
12:39
Haha happens to the best of us
HopefullyInLawSchool
12:40
@BruceSutter: so real
JumpySubsequentDolphin
12:40
still feels like it might be worth a shot to ED. I think duke’s ED II app deadline hasn’t passed, right?
12:41
@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you know schools that are like 350th ranked have people with 170+ lsats, right? GPA and all that does play a role and bruce is likely not getting what he wants
HopefullyInLawSchool
12:42
Whats the point of being self defeating and never trying tho?
350th ranked law school: https://www.freedomlawschool.org
babycat
12:43
new question for folks here, do you think being kjd demonstrably hurts your application?
JumpySubsequentDolphin
12:43
hopefully not 😀
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
12:43
That’s incredible lion
yeah duke ed 2 is in jan, i think if i don't get in berk ed i'll do that assuming that i haven't gotten a decision from them by that point
12:43
haha i said "like," my local school is like 300-500th depending on year and they usually have 5+ 170+ scorers
2big2fail
12:44
i cant imagine it hurts your application if you demonstrate purpose and direction. the problem with some kjds is they dont really know what they want with life yet
the usnews rankings don't even go down that far
12:44
Duke is pretty gpa sensitive. The most sub 3 gpa friendly T14s are gulc, uva, and now cornell
babycat
12:44
@EvolBunny: there are 198 ABA accredited schools in the US
the vast majority of 170+ are enrolling at T20's--that's the only way they keep a 170 median lmao
HopefullyInLawSchool
12:44
just claim what you want in life in applications and then it can change in law school as ur exposed to stuff
@babycat: I don't think so, assuming that you have a cohesive why law and actually did stuff in undergrad. I mean ofc your application will always be stronger given work experience, but I don't think KJD status on its own "hurts" your application.
12:45
best thing you can do as a sub 3 is clear Wash U's median and go there, which I'm going to try to do in January if I don't hear from UGA before the deadline to sign up (Dec 3)
babycat
12:45
I'm just saying this as a hypothetical. people say urm boost is the equivalent of x LSAT point increase. was just wondering if there was an equivalent kJD decrease
I think you guys think about yourselves too much. All you can do is put together a well rounded application and simply wait!
@EvolBunny: I think you just proved yourself wrong lmao. It is showing 50 percent of people with those stats getting into WashU.
"@JumpySubsequentDolphin: you know schools that are like 350th ranked have people with 170+ lsats, right? GPA and all that does play a role and bruce is likely not getting what he wants"
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
12:46
I’m gonna drink a bottle of Jack for every rejection
babycat
12:47
call me curious George the way I be asking questions
babycat
12:47
actually the opposite of thinking about myself I just want to see what other people think
12:48
@texaslawhopefully: is washu the entire t20? Or notorious for letting applicants redact gpa or lsat? Like okay i guess washu, what about the rest? Buddy literally said he is a nothing candidate except high lsat. No EC, WE, minority status, right skin color, military, in state, etc. That means he will be fucked by the t20, except maybe washu
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.