Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Things in action

Read a random definition: Disclosure Document Program

A quick definition of Things in action:

Things in action: This is something that someone is supposed to get because they have a legal right to it. It is usually money. For example, if someone has been hurt and they can sue for money, they have a thing in action until the court decides what should happen.

A more thorough explanation:

Things in action

Things in action refer to a property that someone is entitled to receive by law. This property is usually in the form of money. For instance, if someone has a legal claim against another person, they have a thing in action until the court makes a final decision or the time limit for suing expires.

1. A person who has been injured in a car accident has a thing in action against the driver who caused the accident. They can sue the driver for compensation for their injuries and damages.

2. A tenant who has paid a security deposit to their landlord has a thing in action. They are entitled to get their deposit back at the end of their lease, provided they have fulfilled all the terms of the lease agreement.

The examples illustrate how a person can have a thing in action in different situations. In the first example, the person has a legal claim against the driver who caused the accident. They can sue the driver to get compensation for their injuries and damages. Until the court makes a final decision, the person has a thing in action. In the second example, the tenant has paid a security deposit to their landlord. They are entitled to get their deposit back at the end of their lease. Until the landlord returns the deposit, the tenant has a thing in action.

Thereinafter | Third amendment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.