Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

three wicked sisters

Read a random definition: Child Support Recovery Act of 1994

A quick definition of three wicked sisters:

Term: Three Wicked Sisters

Definition: Three wicked sisters were three rules that were used by courts in the 19th century to deny workers who were injured on the job from getting compensation. These rules were called contributory negligence, the fellow-servant rule, and assumption of the risk. They made it very hard for workers to get help from their employers when they got hurt at work. The courts thought that workers should have known the risks of their jobs and that they were responsible for their own injuries. But later on, the courts realized that these rules were too harsh and started to change them.

A more thorough explanation:

Three Wicked Sisters: A term used to describe the three doctrines - contributory negligence, the fellow-servant rule, and assumption of the risk - that were used by courts in the 19th century to deny compensation to workers who were injured on the job.

During the 19th century, courts used three doctrines to deny compensation to workers who were injured on the job. These doctrines were:

  • Contributory negligence: This doctrine stated that if the worker was partially responsible for their injury, they could not receive compensation.
  • The fellow-servant rule: This doctrine stated that if the worker was injured by a fellow employee, they could not receive compensation from their employer.
  • Assumption of the risk: This doctrine stated that if the worker knew the risks associated with their job, they could not receive compensation for any injuries they sustained.

These three doctrines were collectively known as the "three wicked sisters" because they made it very difficult for workers to receive compensation for their injuries.

For example, if a worker was injured on the job because they were not wearing the proper safety equipment, the court could use the contributory negligence doctrine to deny them compensation. Similarly, if a worker was injured by a fellow employee, the court could use the fellow-servant rule to deny them compensation. Finally, if a worker was injured while performing a task that they knew was dangerous, the court could use the assumption of the risk doctrine to deny them compensation.

These examples illustrate how the "three wicked sisters" made it difficult for workers to receive compensation for their injuries.

three-strikes law | threshold

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.