Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

time of memory

Read a random definition: chief

A quick definition of time of memory:

Time of Memory: A really long time ago, before anyone alive today can remember, there was a time when things were done a certain way. This time is so far back that there is no proof that things were different. In the law, this time is usually considered to be before the year 1189. It's also called time out of memory or time out of mind. Sometimes, there are things that happened even before this time that we can't know about because it's beyond what the law can remember.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Time of memory refers to a point in time that is so far back that no living person has knowledge or proof contradicting the right or custom alleged to have existed since then. It can also refer to a point in time beyond which legal memory cannot go or a very long time.

  • According to common law, time immemorial was fixed as the year 1189, the year that Henry II of England died. This means that any right or custom that has been in existence since that time is considered valid and cannot be challenged.
  • Legal memory in England and Wales extends back to the year 1285. This means that any legal claim or dispute that arose before that time is considered to be outside the scope of legal memory and cannot be enforced.
  • The ancient ruins of Stonehenge have been standing for a time of memory, as they were built over 4,000 years ago.

These examples illustrate the concept of time of memory by showing how it is used to establish the validity of rights and customs, as well as the limits of legal memory. They also demonstrate how it can refer to a very long time, such as the age of ancient monuments like Stonehenge.

time note | time option

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
You have like, 36 hours left chickenburgahfart
Better get cracking
dude im so cooked
i didnt have a chance to go christmas shopping since 1L finals went thru the 20th lol
waitlisted at fordham just received
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: I'm sorry man, that's a bummer. A WL isn't a hard no, though, you've got this!
@soap: soap minnesota queen arc? ice queen era?
soap
13:36
99% chance I'm going to Minnesota, so may as well plan it all out!
soap
13:39
Unless I get into a T14 with a scholly, but I really don't think that's likely. Lol.
my goat stock has been replenished since returning to florida. i will sacrifice one in your name
soap
13:43
That's pretty goated of you
1a2b3c4d26z
13:43
hi guys
13:43
hi guys
soap
13:43
hi guys
1a2b3c4d26z
13:43
:)
hi guys
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
hi guys
1a2b3c4d26z
13:43
What does everyone want for christmas
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
an A from UCI
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
with lotsssss of scholarship!
a lobotomy
soap
13:45
M̶i̶c̶h̶i̶g̶a̶n̶ ̶A a good Christmas dinner
13:46
Blowjobs
13:47
Extra sucky style
ED --> RD at CLS Waitlist at Fordham below both medians at both. Should i be hopeful for next cycle if i retake my LSAT and get my score up? no hard rejections so far, has to mean something right? LOL im going crazy
higher lsat makes everything way easier
but the fact that both schools didn’t R you means that you’re at least a competitive applicant
jackfrost11770
13:49
HI WASPY :)
probably my WE and softs. Do reapplicants have lower chances at admissions? I've read few negative things but I dont wanna like poison my brain with those lol.
Also, do i have to write new personal statements if i reapply?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.