Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

time out of mind

Read a random definition: dote

A quick definition of time out of mind:

Time out of mind refers to a time so long ago that nobody alive today knows for sure what happened then. It's like a really, really old story that has been passed down from generation to generation. In the past, the law used to say that this time was before the year 1189, which is over 800 years ago! It's also a way of saying that something has been happening for a very long time, even if we don't know exactly how long.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Time out of mind refers to a point in time that is so far back that no living person has knowledge or proof contradicting the right or custom alleged to have existed since then. It can also refer to a point in time beyond which legal memory cannot go or simply a very long time.

  • According to common law, time immemorial was fixed as the year 1189, the year that Henry II of England died. This means that any right or custom that has existed since that time is considered valid and cannot be challenged.
  • The origins of this tradition are lost in time out of mind, but it has been passed down from generation to generation for centuries.
  • The legal concept of legal memory means that any event or right that occurred before the year 1189 is considered to be time out of mind and cannot be proven or disproven in a court of law.

These examples illustrate how time out of mind can refer to a point in time that is so far back that it is impossible to prove or disprove anything that happened before that time. It is a legal concept that is used to determine the validity of certain rights and customs, and it can also be used to describe a very long time.

time out of memory | time-place-or-manner restriction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 4 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.