Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

time-price doctrine

Read a random definition: rational-purpose test

A quick definition of time-price doctrine:

The time-price doctrine is a rule that says if you buy something and agree to pay for it later, the seller can charge you more than if you paid for it right away. This extra amount is to make up for the risk that you might not pay them back and for the interest they could have earned if you paid right away. This rule doesn't apply to people who really need to borrow money and might be taken advantage of by lenders.

A more thorough explanation:

The time-price doctrine is a rule that applies to debts that arise from a purchase and sale. It states that if a higher price is charged for a deferred payment than for an immediate payment, the usury laws do not apply. This means that the seller can charge more for a product if the buyer chooses to pay for it over time instead of all at once.

For example, let's say you want to buy a new TV that costs $1,000. The seller offers you two options: pay $1,000 upfront or pay $1,200 over the course of a year. If you choose to pay over time, the extra $200 is considered compensation to the seller for the risk that you might default on your payments and for the interest they could have earned if you had paid upfront.

The time-price doctrine is important because it recognizes that buyers who choose to pay over time are not in the same position as borrowers who are forced to take out loans from potentially predatory lenders. Buyers have the option to save up and pay the cash price, while borrowers may not have that luxury.

time-price differential | time-sharing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.