Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trade usage

Read a random definition: alternatim

A quick definition of trade usage:

Trade Usage: A way of doing things that is commonly used in a specific profession or business. It is a regular practice that people expect to be followed in a particular trade or region. It can be established by expert testimony and is often relied upon by people in that trade or business. It is not a legal rule, but it can give meaning to or supplement an agreement between parties.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Trade usage refers to a customary and uniform practice that is well-known in a specific profession or business. It is a practice or method of dealing that has such regularity of observance in a region, vocation, or trade that it justifies an expectation that it will be observed in a given transaction.

Examples: A common example of trade usage is the practice of tipping in the service industry. It is customary to tip waiters, bartenders, and hairdressers in the United States, and it is expected that customers will follow this practice. Another example is the use of industry-specific jargon or terminology. For instance, doctors use medical terms that are not commonly understood by the general public, but are well-known and expected within the medical profession.

Explanation: Trade usage is a well-established practice that is widely recognized and followed within a particular industry or profession. It is not a legal rule, but rather a customary or habitual practice that is relied upon by those who are conversant in, or connected with, a trade or business. The examples illustrate how trade usage is a common and expected practice within certain industries, and how it can vary from one profession to another.

trade union | trading

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.