Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

transaction-or-occurrence test

Read a random definition: law of the trial

A quick definition of transaction-or-occurrence test:

The transaction-or-occurrence test is a way to determine if a claim is a compulsory counterclaim under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There are four different tests that can be used to determine this:

  1. Are the legal and factual issues raised by the claim and counterclaim largely the same?
  2. Would res judicata (a legal principle that prevents a party from re-litigating a claim) bar a later suit on the counterclaim if the compulsory-counterclaim rule did not exist?
  3. Will substantially the same evidence support or refute both the plaintiff's claim and the counterclaim?
  4. Are the claim and counterclaim logically related?

If the answer to any of these questions is yes, then the claim is likely a compulsory counterclaim. This means that it must be brought in the same lawsuit as the original claim, or it may be barred from being brought in a later lawsuit.

A more thorough explanation:

The transaction-or-occurrence test is a method used to determine if a claim is a compulsory counterclaim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13(a). There are four different tests that can be used:

  1. Are the legal and factual issues raised by the claim and counterclaim largely the same?
  2. Would res judicata prevent a later suit on the counterclaim if the compulsory-counterclaim rule did not exist?
  3. Will substantially the same evidence support or refute both the plaintiff's claim and the counterclaim?
  4. Are the claim and counterclaim logically related?

For example, if a person sues their landlord for breach of contract, and the landlord files a counterclaim for unpaid rent, the transaction-or-occurrence test would be used to determine if the counterclaim is compulsory. If the legal and factual issues raised by the breach of contract claim and the unpaid rent counterclaim are largely the same, then the counterclaim would likely be compulsory.

transaction cost | transcribe

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.