Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trial by combat

Read a random definition: negligent offense

A quick definition of trial by combat:

Term: Trial by Combat

Definition: Trial by combat was a way of settling disputes in the Middle Ages where the two people involved in the disagreement would fight each other. The idea was that God would give victory to the person who was in the right. This method was introduced into England by the Normans after 1066, but it was not very popular and was rarely used. It was replaced by other methods of trial and was officially abolished in 1818.

A more thorough explanation:

Trial by combat was a legal practice in Europe and England during the Middle Ages. It was a trial that was decided by personal battle between the disputants. The idea behind this practice was that God would give victory to the person who was in the right.

This method was introduced into England by the Normans after 1066, but it was not widely accepted and was little used. It became obsolete several centuries before being formally abolished in 1818. It was replaced in practice by the grand assize and indictment.

For example, if someone was accused of a crime, they could choose to fight the accuser in a personal battle. The winner of the battle would be considered innocent, and the loser would be found guilty.

Trial by combat was a controversial practice, and many people did not believe that it was a fair way to determine guilt or innocence.

trial brief | trial by corsnaed

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
MrThickRopes
5:46
goo morning
MrThickRopes
5:46
i ain slept i'm wired af
MrThickRopes
5:46
FO PM GON BE A MOVIIIIEEEEEE
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.