Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

trust-fund doctrine

Read a random definition: carry

A quick definition of trust-fund doctrine:

The trust-fund doctrine is a rule that says when a company goes bankrupt, all the things it owns, including the money people paid to buy its stock, are held in a special fund. This fund is used to pay back the company's creditors, the people it owes money to. The creditors can take things from the fund to help pay off what they are owed, unless someone else bought something from the company without knowing about the bankruptcy. This rule is also called the trust-fund theory.

A more thorough explanation:

The trust-fund doctrine is a principle that states that the assets of an insolvent company, including paid and unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock, are held as a trust fund. This fund is used to pay the company's creditors. The creditors may follow the property constituting this fund and use it to reduce the debts, unless it has passed into the hands of a bona fide purchaser without notice. This principle is also known as the trust-fund theory.

Let's say a company goes bankrupt and owes money to its creditors. The trust-fund doctrine ensures that the assets of the company are held in trust for the benefit of the creditors. This means that the creditors can use the assets to pay off the debts owed to them. For example, if the company owns a building, the creditors can sell the building to pay off the debts.

Another example is if a company has received money from investors for shares in the company. If the company becomes insolvent, the trust-fund doctrine ensures that the money paid by the investors is held in trust for the benefit of the creditors. The creditors can use this money to pay off the debts owed to them.

These examples illustrate how the trust-fund doctrine works in practice. It ensures that the assets of an insolvent company are used to pay off the debts owed to the creditors.

trust estate | trust indenture

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Morning
10:37
Gecko, I feel pretty good. Two of the RC passages had really tough inference questions -- hoping I narrowed down my answer choices correctly
10:38
Very happy with LR other than having to guess on a couple questions cuz of time
10:42
i have a question about my personal statement. in my activism for the hospitality workers' union, i organized and spoke up in favor of stronger regulations on airbnb because the unregulated spread of airbnb throughout LA was inflating housing costs for workers and threatening their job security. do you think it's too divisive to mention regulating airbnb? idk
Nostradumbass
10:44
I wrote mine about how all activists should be consolidated into a large smelting pot and refined down to a viscous goo
Nostradumbass
10:45
Expecting a lot of rejections though
11:07
I'm sure you'll get a full ride to a few schools :P
11:11
The impression I get is most schools try not to judge based on the political implications of what you write about. They probably care more that you saw a problem and tried to fix it. That seems like a great thing to write a PS about @chowie
11:18
Besides, if a school didn’t let you in for trying to fix a problem you saw in your community, that doesn’t say great things about your school’s culture (assuming the thing you did showed good common sense judgment ofc)
11:19
That school’s* culture
11:23
Thanks Howl you're right :D I def talked about solving problems in my PS
12:03
@HowlEngineer: what's your dream school
MildChiller
12:08
"Have you applied for admission to [school] in a prior year" I applied in Oct. of the 23-24 cycle, should I put 23 or 24 as the year I applied?
MildChiller
12:09
Bcuz 2023 is when I technically applied but I applied for admissions in 2024
12:14
2024 cuz that's when you would've been admitted
I agree with Howl
12:19
Gecko what's ur dream school
Hard to say. I'm pretty firmly committed to the philly area so probably temple or villanova
Also relatively debt averse so I'd have to get a good scholarship from BC or Fordham to want to go but that's not very likely for me
Any advice? lol
[] baddestbunny
12:25
what’s a good scholarship for you? what would make BC or Fordham worth it?
12:25
Hmmmm let me think
[] baddestbunny
12:25
fordham’s max aid they give is 45k per year
Bunny I can possibly get a 75%+ scholarship from villanova or temple, and I'd be moving back in with my parents if I went there so I'd have near-zero COL. It'd be really hard to beat that
I would prefer BC over Fordham just because I like boston more, but I'm expecting a WL there tbh
I would maybe consider BC with $ but I don't know how to decide if a better biglaw chance is worth the COL + higher tuition
12:50
How do I know if my status checkers are properly linked
12:59
@ChowieBean: right now, Michigan, but there are several that come close. How about you?
13:05
@Law01: I haven't gotten the status checkers to work at all. When I sent an email to the LSData folks the other week, they said they were working on fixing them
13:10
but I think "Last Checked" would change from "Never" to something else
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.