Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

two-witness rule

Read a random definition: discrimination

A quick definition of two-witness rule:

The two-witness rule is a guideline that requires at least two people to confirm that someone lied under oath before they can be charged with perjury. This means that one person's word alone is not enough to prove that someone committed perjury. Instead, there must be additional evidence or another witness to support the claim.

A more thorough explanation:

The two-witness rule is a legal principle that requires two independent witnesses or one witness along with corroborating evidence to establish that the alleged perjurer gave false testimony. This rule is used to support a perjury conviction.

Suppose a witness testifies in court that they saw the defendant commit a crime. However, the defendant's lawyer presents evidence that the witness was not present at the scene of the crime. To prove that the witness committed perjury, the two-witness rule would require another witness or corroborating evidence to support the claim that the witness gave false testimony.

Another example could be a case where a witness testifies that they saw the defendant steal a car. However, the defendant's lawyer presents evidence that the witness was not in the area at the time of the theft. To prove that the witness committed perjury, the two-witness rule would require another witness or corroborating evidence to support the claim that the witness gave false testimony.

These examples illustrate how the two-witness rule is used to ensure that a perjury conviction is based on reliable evidence. It prevents a conviction based on the testimony of a single witness, which may be unreliable or biased.

two-tier offer | tying

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.