Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

two-witness rule

Read a random definition: grand distress

A quick definition of two-witness rule:

The two-witness rule is a guideline that requires at least two people to confirm that someone lied under oath before they can be charged with perjury. This means that one person's word alone is not enough to prove that someone committed perjury. Instead, there must be additional evidence or another witness to support the claim.

A more thorough explanation:

The two-witness rule is a legal principle that requires two independent witnesses or one witness along with corroborating evidence to establish that the alleged perjurer gave false testimony. This rule is used to support a perjury conviction.

Suppose a witness testifies in court that they saw the defendant commit a crime. However, the defendant's lawyer presents evidence that the witness was not present at the scene of the crime. To prove that the witness committed perjury, the two-witness rule would require another witness or corroborating evidence to support the claim that the witness gave false testimony.

Another example could be a case where a witness testifies that they saw the defendant steal a car. However, the defendant's lawyer presents evidence that the witness was not in the area at the time of the theft. To prove that the witness committed perjury, the two-witness rule would require another witness or corroborating evidence to support the claim that the witness gave false testimony.

These examples illustrate how the two-witness rule is used to ensure that a perjury conviction is based on reliable evidence. It prevents a conviction based on the testimony of a single witness, which may be unreliable or biased.

two-tier offer | tying

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.