Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ubi dolus dedit causam contractui

Read a random definition: test paper

A quick definition of ubi dolus dedit causam contractui:

Term: UBI DOLUS DEDIT CAUSAM CONTRACTUI

Definition: This is a Latin phrase that means "where fraud gave rise to the contract." It refers to a situation where someone used deceit or trickery to create a contract. For example, if someone lied about the quality of a product in order to get someone to buy it, and then a contract was formed, this phrase would apply. It is important to be honest and truthful when making contracts, so that everyone involved can trust each other and the agreement can be fair.

A more thorough explanation:

UBI DOLUS DEDIT CAUSAM CONTRACTUI

Ubi dolus dedit causam contractui is a Latin term that means where fraud gave rise to the contract.

One example of ubi dolus dedit causam contractui is when a person intentionally misrepresents the quality of a product to a buyer, and the buyer purchases the product based on that misrepresentation. In this case, the contract between the buyer and the seller is based on fraud, and the buyer may have legal recourse to cancel the contract or seek damages.

Another example is when a person enters into a contract with another party, but the other party conceals important information that would have affected the first person's decision to enter into the contract. In this case, the contract may be voidable due to fraud.

Ubi dolus dedit causam contractui highlights the importance of honesty and transparency in contractual agreements. If fraud or misrepresentation is involved in the formation of a contract, it can undermine the validity of the agreement and potentially lead to legal consequences for the party responsible for the fraud. The examples illustrate how fraud can give rise to a contract and how it can be used as a basis for challenging the validity of a contract.

ubi dies cessit, licet nondum venerit | ubi re vera

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.