Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Uncovered option

Read a random definition: Alien Registration Card (ARC)

A quick definition of Uncovered option:

Uncovered option: An uncovered option is another term for a naked option. This means that the seller of the option does not own the underlying asset and is exposed to unlimited risk if the option is exercised. For example, if someone sells a call option on a stock they do not own, and the stock price rises significantly, they would have to purchase the stock at the higher price to fulfill the option contract. This can result in significant losses for the seller.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An uncovered option, also known as a naked option, is a type of options contract where the seller does not hold the underlying asset or security. This means that the seller is exposed to unlimited risk if the option is exercised.

Example: Let's say that John sells a call option for XYZ stock, but he does not actually own any shares of XYZ. If the option is exercised, John will have to purchase the shares on the open market at the current market price and sell them to the option holder at the strike price. If the market price of XYZ rises significantly, John could potentially lose a lot of money.

Explanation: This example illustrates the risk involved in selling an uncovered option. Because John does not own any shares of XYZ, he is essentially betting that the stock price will not rise above the strike price of the option. If it does, he will have to purchase the shares at a higher price and sell them at a lower price, resulting in a loss. This is why selling uncovered options is generally considered to be a high-risk strategy.

uncontested divorce | under the influence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.