Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Uniform Commercial Code

Read a random definition: veritas

A quick definition of Uniform Commercial Code:

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of rules that governs how businesses buy and sell things. Every state in the United States has adopted some version of the UCC. It covers things like buying and leasing goods, using checks and other types of payments, and borrowing money. It helps make sure that businesses follow the same rules when they do business with each other.

A more thorough explanation:

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of laws that govern commercial transactions in the United States. It has been adopted in some form by every state and the District of Columbia. The UCC covers a wide range of topics related to commercial transactions, including sales and leases of goods, negotiable instruments, and secured transactions.

  • When a business buys goods from another business, the UCC provides rules for the sale of those goods. For example, the UCC specifies that the seller must deliver the goods to the buyer and that the buyer must pay for them.
  • If a business wants to borrow money and use its assets as collateral, the UCC provides rules for creating a security interest in those assets. For example, the UCC requires that the security interest be properly recorded to be enforceable against other creditors.

These examples illustrate how the UCC provides a framework for commercial transactions and helps ensure that businesses can rely on consistent rules across different states.

Uniform Code of Military Justice | Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.