Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act

Read a random definition: mortgage delinquency

A quick definition of Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act:

The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act is a law that helps protect people from businesses that lie or trick them. It covers things like using someone else's brand name, saying bad things about a competitor's product, or making false claims in advertising. The law makes it illegal for businesses to do these things and provides consequences for those who break the rules. Another similar law is the Baby FTC Act, which also stops businesses from being unfair or dishonest.

A more thorough explanation:

The Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act is a law created in 1964 that helps protect consumers from false advertising and other forms of commercial deception. It includes many common-law intellectual-property torts, such as trademark infringement, passing off, trade disparagement, and false advertising.

The Act provides a list of practices that are prohibited, all of which involve misrepresentation. For example, a company cannot make false claims about the benefits of their product or service, or use a logo or name that is similar to a competitor's to confuse customers.

Another example of a prohibited practice is bait-and-switch advertising, where a company advertises a product at a low price to attract customers, but then tries to sell them a more expensive product instead.

These examples illustrate how the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act helps protect consumers from dishonest business practices and ensures that companies are held accountable for their actions.

Uniform Customs and Practice for Commercial Documentary Credits | Uniform Determination of Death Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.