Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Uniform Premarital Agreements Act

Read a random definition: bonded debt

A quick definition of Uniform Premarital Agreements Act:

The Uniform Premarital Agreements Act (UPAA) is a law created in 1983 that helps people create prenuptial contracts before getting married. These contracts are written agreements that become effective only after the couple gets married. The UPAA provides a clear framework for drafting complete and enforceable agreements that can govern the couple's assets, support, and obligations during the marriage, at death, and upon divorce. About one-third of the states in the United States have adopted the UPAA in some form.

A more thorough explanation:

The Uniform Premarital Agreements Act (UPAA) is a model statute created in 1983 that provides guidelines for drafting prenuptial contracts. The UPAA ensures that prenuptial agreements are complete and enforceable.

According to the UPAA, a premarital agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. It only becomes effective upon marriage. The agreement can cover various aspects such as assets, support, and obligations during the marriage, at death, and upon divorce.

For example, if a couple decides to get married and one of them owns a business, they may want to create a prenuptial agreement that outlines how the business will be divided in case of a divorce. Another example is if one partner has significant debt, they may want to include provisions in the prenuptial agreement that protect the other partner from being responsible for that debt.

The UPAA has been adopted in about one-third of the states in the United States. Its purpose is to provide a more certain framework for drafting prenuptial agreements and to ensure that both parties are protected in case of a divorce.

Uniform Partnership Act | Uniform Principal and Income Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.