Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

United States Code

Read a random definition: mistakenly induced revocation

A quick definition of United States Code:

The United States Code (U.S.C.) is a collection of laws made by Congress and signed by the President. The laws are organized into different topics called "titles" and there are 54 titles in total. The U.S.C. contains most of the laws that are important for the country. However, sometimes new laws are made after the U.S.C. is published, so it's important to check for updates. Some books that have the U.S.C. also have notes that explain the laws and how they have changed over time. When people talk about a law, they usually say where it can be found in the U.S.C. For example, a court case might talk about "28 U.S.C. § 1452(a)" which means section 1452, subsection a, of title 28 in the U.S.C.

A more thorough explanation:

The United States Code (U.S.C.) is a collection of federal statutes that have been enacted by Congress and signed by the President. These statutes are organized by topic into a series of titles, numbered from 1 to 54. The U.S. Code contains almost all of the statutes of general effect at the time of its compilation.

However, to ensure an up-to-date understanding of the statutes related to a particular topic, one must consult both the U.S. Code and determine whether there have been any pertinent amendments or additions to the law since its compilation.

Some commercially published editions of the U.S. Code include editorial notes that detail the changes over time that lie behind current provisions and summarize court decisions and regulations interpreting them. When a judicial opinion or other legal document refers to a particular statutory provision, it will normally cite to its location in the U.S. Code.

In Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, the court dealt with a statute addressing jurisdiction by Federal and state courts in situations of bankruptcy. The decision focuses on the language of "28 U.S.C. § 1452(a)" -- which is subsection a, of section 1452, of title 28 of the U.S. Code.

This example illustrates how the U.S. Code is used as a reference in legal documents and court cases to identify specific statutory provisions related to a particular topic.

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) | United States Copyright Office

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.