Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

judicial opinion

Read a random definition: nonjudicial foreclosure

A quick definition of judicial opinion:

A judicial opinion is a written statement by a court explaining its decision in a case. It includes the facts, points of law, reasoning, and sometimes additional comments. An advisory opinion is a nonbinding statement by a court on a legal matter. A dissenting opinion is when one or more judges disagree with the majority decision. A plurality opinion is when no opinion has a majority, but one has the most votes. Other types of opinions include a memorandum opinion, per curiam opinion, and slip opinion. Outside of the legal context, an opinion can also refer to a person's belief or inference about something.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A written statement by a court explaining its decision in a case, including the facts, points of law, rationale, and dicta. It is also known as a court opinion or simply an opinion.

Examples:

  • Majority opinion: An opinion joined by more than half of the judges considering a given case.
  • Dissenting opinion: An opinion by one or more judges who disagree with the decision reached by the majority.
  • Per curiam opinion: An opinion handed down by an appellate court without identifying the individual judge who wrote the opinion.

These examples illustrate how a judicial opinion is a written statement by a court explaining its decision in a case. Majority opinions are those joined by more than half of the judges, while dissenting opinions are those by judges who disagree with the majority. Per curiam opinions are those handed down by an appellate court without identifying the individual judge who wrote the opinion.

judicial officer | judicial order

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.