Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

uxorial

Read a random definition: enfranchisement

A quick definition of uxorial:

Term: UXORIAL

Definition: Uxorial means something that relates to or is characteristic of a wife. It is used to describe things that are associated with a wife, such as her property or behavior.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Uxorial (pronounced "uhk-sawr-ee-uhl" or "g-zawr-ee-uhl") is an adjective that describes something related to a wife or characteristic of a wife.

Example: Uxorial property refers to property that is owned by a wife.

Explanation: The example illustrates that the term "uxorial" is used to describe something that is related to a wife. In this case, "uxorial property" refers to property that is owned by a wife. This term is often used in legal contexts to describe property that is owned by a wife separately from her husband.

uxore rapta et abducta | uxoricide

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
ImpartialLion
20:32
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
windyMagician
20:37
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
llama
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
20:59
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
21:00
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
llama
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
llama
21:05
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jTv6iNl9_kfTVbDdIw4ml-CeKWOkeWtArYhhuj1-8U8/edit?usp=sharing 13.7
llama
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
llama
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
Dkk
21:10
https://x.com/TheManlet_King/status/1882180191851774268
llama
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
llama
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
llama
21:42
Those are fighting words
info-man
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
CurvyHypnoticSheepdog
22:13
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
[] swagadocious
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.