Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

vi et armis

Read a random definition: Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei

A quick definition of vi et armis:

Term: VI ET ARMIS

Definition: Vi et armis means using force and weapons. It is a term used in history to describe actions that were done with violence. In legal terms, it was used in indictments for offenses that involved actual disturbance of peace or acts of violence. However, it was not necessary for offenses that involved cheating, non-performance, or consequential injury. The term was used in medieval pleading to describe a trespass that involved force and was a matter for the King's Court because it breached the peace. In England, it was a formal requirement of pleading until 1852.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Vi et armis (vI et ahr-mis) is a Latin term used in history to describe actions taken by force and arms. It was commonly used in indictments for offenses that involved violence or disturbance of the peace. However, it was not necessary for offenses that involved cheating, non-feazance, or consequential injury.

Example: If someone breaks into a house and steals something, they have committed a crime vi et armis because they used force to enter the house and take the item. However, if someone cheats on their taxes, they have not committed a crime vi et armis because there was no use of force or violence.

The examples illustrate the definition by showing how the term is used to describe actions that involve force and violence. In the first example, the person used force to enter the house and take the item, which is a clear example of vi et armis. In the second example, there was no use of force or violence, so the term does not apply.

vie | view

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
its also still early in the day
i think theres def more waves todayu
StillDoingMyBest
14:25
do y'all think the lsat is easier or harder without the logic games
[] starfishies
14:25
ppl prob need a few minutes to update their results
pee pee poo poo
if i get a decision today ill dye my hair
14:26
dye it grey plz
or ppiece a new whole
i would look terrible with grey hair
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.