Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Voter bill of rights

Read a random definition: primary market

A quick definition of Voter bill of rights:

A voter bill of rights is a set of rules that protect people's right to vote. Each state has its own set of rules, but they usually include things like who can vote, where to vote, and how to get help if needed. They also make sure that people can vote without anyone watching or bothering them, and that they can report any illegal activity they see at the polls. You can find your state's voter bill of rights by checking with the secretary of state's office or looking online.

A more thorough explanation:

Voter bill of rights

A voter bill of rights is a set of rules that protect the rights of voters. These rules are different in each state, but they usually include information about who can vote, where they can vote, and what their rights are when they vote. Voter bills of rights also protect voters' privacy and give them the right to report any illegal activity they see at the polls.

For example, in California, the voter bill of rights says that every voter has the right to cast a ballot if they are registered to vote and in line before the polls close. It also says that voters have the right to ask for help if they need it, and that they can vote without anyone watching them. In Texas, the voter bill of rights says that voters have the right to bring an interpreter with them if they need one, and that they can vote even if they don't have a photo ID.

These examples illustrate how voter bills of rights protect the rights of voters and ensure that everyone has a fair and equal opportunity to vote.

voluntary waste | Voting Rights Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.