Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Voting trust

Read a random definition: proclamation of rebellion

A quick definition of Voting trust:

A voting trust is when shareholders give their voting rights to a trustee who controls a unified voting block. This gives the trustee a stronger voice on matters of corporate governance than individual shareholders. It is created to last for a specific period of time and is used to defend against hostile takeovers.

A more thorough explanation:

A voting trust is a legal arrangement where shareholders transfer both the legal title and voting rights of their shares to a trustee. The trustee then controls a unified voting block, which has a stronger voice on matters of corporate governance than individual shareholders could have on their own. This arrangement is created to last for a specified period of time and is used to defend against hostile takeovers.

Let's say that a company is facing a hostile takeover bid from another company. The shareholders of the target company are concerned about losing control of their company and decide to form a voting trust. They transfer their shares to a trustee who then controls the voting rights of those shares. The trustee can then vote on behalf of all the shareholders, giving them a stronger voice in the decision-making process.

Another example could be a family-owned business where the family members want to ensure that the business stays within the family. They can form a voting trust and transfer their shares to a trustee who will vote on behalf of all the family members, ensuring that the business stays within the family.

These examples illustrate how a voting trust can be used to protect the interests of shareholders and ensure that they have a stronger voice in the decision-making process.

Voting Rights Act | W-2 form

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.