Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

wear and tear

Read a random definition: decedent

A quick definition of wear and tear:

Term: Wear and Tear

Definition: Wear and tear is when something gets damaged or worn out from being used regularly. It's like when your favorite toy starts to look old and worn because you play with it a lot. When you rent a house or apartment, you are responsible for taking care of it, but you are not responsible for fixing things that get damaged from normal use. This is called fair wear and tear. For example, if the carpet gets a little worn from people walking on it, that's fair wear and tear. But if you spill something on the carpet and it leaves a stain, that's not fair wear and tear and you would be responsible for cleaning it or paying for it to be cleaned.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Wear and tear refers to the natural deterioration or depreciation of property resulting from its reasonable use. It is the damage caused by ordinary use and the ordinary operation of natural forces.

For example, if you rent an apartment and live in it for a year, there will be some wear and tear on the property. This might include scuff marks on the walls, worn carpet, or a leaky faucet. These are all examples of normal wear and tear that the landlord cannot charge you for when you move out.

However, if you were to punch a hole in the wall or spill red wine on the carpet, that would be considered damage beyond normal wear and tear. In that case, the landlord could charge you for the cost of repairs or replacement.

Overall, wear and tear is a normal part of using and enjoying property, and landlords cannot hold tenants responsible for it.

wear | Webb–Pomerene Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.