Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

weight of evidence

Read a random definition: paydown

A quick definition of weight of evidence:

Weight of evidence refers to how believable or convincing evidence is, rather than how much of it there is. It's not about numbers, but about how likely the evidence is to make someone believe one side of an argument over the other. Basically, it's about how strong the evidence is.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Weight of evidence refers to the strength or persuasiveness of evidence in terms of its probative value, rather than the quantity or amount of evidence presented. It is determined by the effect it has on inducing belief, rather than mathematical calculations. In legal terms, weight of evidence refers to the tendency of credible evidence to support one side over the other.

For example, in a criminal trial, the prosecution may present a witness who testifies that they saw the defendant commit the crime. This testimony may carry a lot of weight of evidence, as it is a direct eyewitness account of the crime. On the other hand, the defense may present an alibi witness who testifies that the defendant was with them at the time of the crime. This testimony may also carry weight of evidence, as it provides an alternative explanation for the defendant's whereabouts at the time of the crime.

However, the weight of evidence is not solely determined by the number of witnesses or pieces of evidence presented. For instance, if the prosecution presents multiple witnesses who contradict each other or have questionable credibility, their testimony may carry less weight of evidence than a single credible witness.

Similarly, if the defense presents multiple pieces of evidence that are easily explained or contradicted by the prosecution, their evidence may carry less weight of evidence than a single piece of evidence that is difficult to refute.

Overall, the weight of evidence is determined by the persuasiveness and credibility of the evidence presented, rather than the quantity or amount of evidence.

Watkins v. United States (1957) | Weight of the evidence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.