Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

work for hire

Read a random definition: actual-injury trigger

A quick definition of work for hire:

A work for hire is when someone creates something, like a book or a movie, but they don't own it. Instead, the person who paid for it owns it. This can happen if the creator agrees to it before they start making the thing. It can also happen if the creator is an employee and makes the thing as part of their job. Sometimes, a court will decide if something is a work for hire based on who paid for it and how much control they had over how it was made.

A more thorough explanation:

A work for hire is a type of work where the ownership belongs to someone other than the creator. Normally, the person who creates something owns the rights to it. But in a work for hire situation, the rights belong to the person who hired the creator. This can be established through a contract before the work is created.

There are two types of works that can be considered works for hire:

  1. Works prepared by an employee within the scope of their job
  2. Works specially commissioned for use in a collective work, motion picture, translation, supplementary work, compilation, instruction text, test or answer for a test, or atlas, if the parties agree in writing that the work is a work for hire

For example, if a company hires an artist to create a logo for them, the logo would be considered a work for hire. The company would own the rights to the logo, not the artist who created it.

There is a test that courts use to determine if a work is a work for hire. It's called the "instance and expense" test. This means that the hiring party must have induced the creation of the work and had the right to direct and supervise how it was carried out. The hiring party must also have paid for the work. If these conditions are met, the work is considered a work for hire.

Overall, a work for hire is a way for someone to own the rights to something that they didn't create themselves. It's important to have a contract in place before the work is created to establish who owns the rights.

work credits | work made for hire

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.