Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

zone of danger rule

Read a random definition: Right of representation

A quick definition of zone of danger rule:

The zone of danger rule is a legal principle that limits the responsibility of people accused of causing emotional distress through negligence. This rule only allows plaintiffs to receive compensation if they were in immediate danger of physical harm and were scared by that danger. Depending on the state, there may be additional requirements that make it even harder to receive compensation.

A more thorough explanation:

The zone of danger rule is a legal principle that limits the liability of people accused of causing emotional distress through negligence. This means that if someone sues for emotional distress, they can only recover damages if they were in immediate danger of physical harm and were frightened by that danger.

For example, if a driver is texting and almost hits a pedestrian, the pedestrian may be able to sue for emotional distress if they were scared by the near-miss. However, if the pedestrian was across the street and only saw the incident happen, they may not be able to sue because they were not in immediate danger.

The zone of danger rule is meant to prevent people from suing for emotional distress when they were not actually in danger. It is important to note that the rule may vary depending on the state and may have additional requirements for recovery.

Other related legal concepts include intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and tort.

zero tape | zone of interests

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.