1459

Class of 2028

First choice school:

3.72/4.3

GPA

Criminology and Statistics

164/180

LSAT

User stats

Softs

T3

URM

Work

1-4 years

Legal Assistant at PI Firm

Goal

-

Apps submitted

0

Scholarships Received

$0

1459's wisdom for future generations

School apps

Rank	2024-2025	Result	App type	FW	Resident	Schol...	Sent	Sent raw	Received	Received raw	Complete	Complete raw	UR	UR raw	UR2	UR2 raw	II	II raw	Decision	Decision raw
98	American University	Accepted	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28											Oct 11	2024-10-11
28	Boston College	Pending	EDearly decision				Sep 27	2024-09-27
24	Boston University	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28
33	Fordham University	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28
41	George Washington Un...	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28
78	Loyola University—Ch...	Pending	RDregular decision				Oct 01	2024-10-01
68	Northeastern University	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 27	2024-09-27
28	UUtah	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28
61	Yeshiva University (...	Pending	RDregular decision				Sep 28	2024-09-28			Oct 11	2024-10-11	Oct 11	2024-10-11

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:37

in the worst way

llama

21:37

Side effect include ruining your life and any chance of interpersonal connection. Would recommend

[] texaslawhopefully

21:37

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: yea, Alito did

llama

21:37

Affect

[] texaslawhopefully

21:38

I think Rahimi is the most interesting case to see how the text, history, tradition test is evolving for conservative jurisprudence

llama

21:38

Too dumb- u pick

[] texaslawhopefully

21:38

because there was what like 6 concurring opinions

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:38

@texaslawhopefully: roberts wants to overturn a lot of current law. he has zero respect for stare decisis

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:39

rahimi was funny solely because it made thomas mad

Eggan

21:39

i like how you call him thomas and not alito (signaling a lack of respect)

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:39

what

Eggan

21:39

also hi ive awoken from my nap and my messages are replenished

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:39

alito’s first name is Samuel

[] texaslawhopefully

21:39

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: I guess I always got the feeling Roberts was a staunch institutionalist. At least, I mean I do buy the 3-3-3 description of the court

Eggan

21:39

oh sorry i jsut woe up

Eggan

21:39

i knew that

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:39

thomas is Clarence hahaha

Eggan

21:40

i hate that guy too tbh

Eggan

21:40

if im being honest tho i dont pay much attention to the supreme court. i know how theyll decide cases at this point i dont need to pay attention to the nuance behind a decision anymore because it's going to follow a pattern

Eggan

21:40

thats what would happen with any type of political majority

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

21:41

the nuance isn’t real they write the reasoning backwards from the holding

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:41

I think a lot of decisions can be very surprising

Eggan

21:42

thats what im saying. i dont pay attention to nuance because theres none to begin with

JumpySubsequentDolphin

21:42

I mean Gorsuch authored bostock

[] texaslawhopefully

21:42

@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: You probably have already seen this, but it's quite interesting: https://empiricalscotus.com/2024/04/01/charting-the-justices-decisions-cutting-across-ideological-lines/

Eggan

21:42

this is true dolphin

[] texaslawhopefully

21:43

@JumpySubsequentDolphin: he also authored mcgirt

shaquilleoatmeal

21:44

personally i think the 3-3-3 is a lame attempt to justify this lopsided conservative court

Eggan

21:44

ok i dont pay too much attention but from what i gather some justices are conservative in a traditional sense and then you have kavanaugh, alito and thomas which are like conservative to the fault that they will stand by conservativism even if it is failing the system

Eggan

21:45

no offense to conservatives but if people are genuinely suffering from a decision SCOTUS makes, especially disproportionately from any disadvantaged demographic, then i would argue the system is failing

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.