Connection lost
Server error
In re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: In a complex drug liability MDL, the court sanctioned defendant AstraZeneca for its “purposefully sluggish” and uncooperative approach to e-discovery. The court found AZ’s production of millions of documents in an unusable format violated its discovery obligations, warranting sanctions under FRCP 37.
Legal Significance: The case underscores a party’s affirmative duty in complex litigation to produce electronically stored information (ESI) in a usable format. It affirms that “purposeful sluggishness” and failure to cooperate in resolving technical issues constitute sanctionable conduct under FRCP 37, even without a formal compulsion order.
In re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In a multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving the drug Seroquel, Plaintiffs moved for discovery sanctions against Defendant AstraZeneca (AZ). The court had entered a Case Management Order (CMO 2) establishing a protocol for the production of electronically stored information (ESI), including data from 80 employee “custodians.” Plaintiffs alleged that AZ failed to comply with its discovery obligations in several ways. Most significantly, AZ produced millions of pages from its custodians in a delayed, incomplete, and unusable format. The production lacked proper metadata, page breaks, and searchable load files, rendering the documents practically inaccessible. AZ had used a unilateral, undisclosed keyword search to filter the documents, which Plaintiffs argued was unreasonably narrow. Furthermore, AZ failed to cooperate in resolving technical issues, refusing to allow Plaintiffs’ technical experts to confer directly with AZ’s vendors. AZ also failed to cooperate in identifying and providing information about its relevant databases as required by the CMO. Although Plaintiffs had previously filed a motion to compel, they withdrew it based on AZ’s representations that it would cure the deficiencies. When AZ failed to do so, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion for sanctions.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a party’s failure to produce electronically stored information in a timely, usable, and searchable format, coupled with a lack of cooperation in resolving technical issues, constitute sanctionable conduct under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 in complex litigation?
Yes. The court granted in part the motion for sanctions, finding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim a
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a party’s failure to produce electronically stored information in a timely, usable, and searchable format, coupled with a lack of cooperation in resolving technical issues, constitute sanctionable conduct under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 in complex litigation?
Conclusion
This case serves as a significant warning to litigants that courts will Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
Legal Rule
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2), a court may sanction a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis focused on the standards for electronic discovery in complex Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure do
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A court sanctioned AstraZeneca (AZ) for e-discovery abuses in the Seroquel