Head-to-head · 21 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 95% chose UCLA. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 21 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Median scholarship (chose UCLA)
Median scholarship (chose Emory University)
View all-time (58 cross-admits)
Trend · UCLA's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA EmploymentCross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesOverview
About UCLA vs Emory University
Across 21 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 95% enrolled at University of California—Los Angeles and 5% at Emory University.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of California—Los Angeles and Emory University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 21 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 21 applicants admitted to both schools, 95% chose to attend University of California—Los Angeles. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of California—Los Angeles is ranked #13 compared to #40 — a gap of 27 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of California—Los Angeles has a median LSAT of 171 compared to 166, a gap of 5 points. This suggests applicants to University of California—Los Angeles face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of California—Los Angeles is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 12.1% compared to Emory University's 30.1%.
University of California—Los Angeles is located in Los Angeles, California, while Emory University is in Atlanta, Georgia. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of California—Los Angeles places 50.5% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 33.7% for the other school. This 17 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of California—Los Angeles has lower tuition at $59,084 per year compared to $69,510. Combined with employment rates of 94.4% (UCLA) and 92.0% (Emory University), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, Emory University offered a median scholarship of $138,000 compared to $77,500, a difference of $60,500 that may factor into enrollment decisions.