Head-to-head · 28 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 89% chose UCI. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 28 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose UCI
Median scholarship (chose UCI)
Median scholarship (chose Loyola Marymount)
View all-time (69 cross-admits)
Trend · UCI's share
Lowest cycle
Highest cycle
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden 2025 ABA 509
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
Overview
About UCI vs Loyola Marymount
Across 28 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 89% enrolled at University of California—Irvine and 11% at Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles. The split has shifted +8 points across the tracked cycles.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of California—Irvine and Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes — plus cross-admit decision data from 28 applicants admitted to both.
Based on 28 applicants admitted to both schools, 89% chose to attend University of California—Irvine. This cross-admit data reflects real enrollment decisions from verified law school applicants on LSD.Law.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of California—Irvine is ranked #34 compared to #70 — a gap of 36 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of California—Irvine has a median LSAT of 169 compared to 163, a gap of 6 points. This suggests applicants to University of California—Irvine face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of California—Irvine is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 14.9% compared to Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles's 26.1%.
Both schools are located in California — University of California—Irvine in Irvine and Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles in Los Angeles — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of California—Irvine places 29.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 16.7% for the other school. This 13 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of California—Irvine has lower tuition at $59,080 per year compared to $70,360. Combined with employment rates of 92.7% (UCI) and 93.2% (Loyola Marymount), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, Loyola Marymount University—Los Angeles offered a median scholarship of $150,000 compared to $75,000, a difference of $75,000 that may factor into enrollment decisions.