Head-to-head · 11 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 100% chose UT. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 11 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Median scholarship (chose OU)
Median scholarship (chose UT)
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield 2025 ABA 509Financial
Sticker price and scholarship aid 2025 ABA 509Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2025 ABA EmploymentOverview
About OU vs UT
Across 11 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 0% enrolled at University of Oklahoma and 100% at University of Texas at Austin.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares University of Oklahoma and University of Texas at Austin across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes using official ABA 509 disclosures.
In the U.S. News rankings, University of Texas at Austin is ranked #16 compared to #62 — a gap of 46 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.
There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of Texas at Austin has a median LSAT of 172 compared to 162, a gap of 10 points. This suggests applicants to University of Texas at Austin face a more competitive admissions pool.
University of Texas at Austin is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 14.0% compared to University of Oklahoma's 33.4%.
University of Oklahoma is located in Norman, Oklahoma, while University of Texas at Austin is in Austin, Texas. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.
Employment outcomes differ substantially: University of Texas at Austin places 39.3% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 5.1% for the other school. This 34 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.
On cost, University of Oklahoma has lower tuition at $18,739 per year compared to $38,236. Combined with employment rates of 94.3% (OU) and 99.4% (UT), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.
Among cross-admitted applicants, University of Texas at Austin offered a median scholarship of $60,000 compared to $47,505, a difference of $12,495 that may factor into enrollment decisions.
Your study break just got better: follow @lawschooldata on Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram